Cookin’ With Gas

Statistical analysis of the Baltimore Orioles on an almost weekly basis.

Archive for May, 2007

Tejada and Gibbons – Where’s the Power?

Posted by cookinwithgas on May 10, 2007

There’s been some discussion on the Orioles Hangout Message Board about the lack of power shown by Miguel Tejada and Jay Gibbons this season.  As seemingly every such discussion these days, this one began with the question of whether (a lack of) steroids has played a role.  I can tell you that I’m neither qualified  nor willing to answer that question.  One thing I do think I’m qualified to do, however, is to analyze a set of stats and try to gain some insight from that analysis.

I wrote this article towards the end of last season in which I talked about Tejada’s increasing tendency to hit more groundballs.  The fact is that the percentage of balls Tejada puts into play that are groundballs has increased every season since 2003 – from 44.04% in 2003 up to 52.59% this season.  This article received some criticism when it came out because many felt the reason for his increase in ground balls is because he’s being pitched differently due to a lack of protection from his teammates. 

What I didn’t say then that I should have said is that even if it is true that he’s being pitched differently, that’s not the point.  The point is that, for whatever reason, he’s putting the ball on the ground much more often than he’s putting it in the air – and the end result is fewer extra base hits.  Think about this – the Orioles clean up hitter is one of the most prolific single’s hitters in the game today.  Having a prolific single’s hitter in the cleanup spot isn’t exactly a recipe for offensive success.  To Tejada’s credit, his propensity for hitting singles as opposed to home runs has not kept this from being his best season in terms of RC/27.

To the data.  I put together this file to show my work.  First, let me explain what I did.  Tejada has been pretty consistent – he has put 579, 593, 572, and 575 balls in play the last four seasons.  I wanted to normalize things, so I multiplied all of his prorated all of his batted ball data to 600 balls in play.  I then put together the graphs to show his trends.  Yes, it would have been easier to just show the percentages, but I wanted to be different.

Check the top left graph.  On normalized basis, he has hit 264, 279, 283, and 306 ground balls the last four years.  He is on pace to hit 316 ground balls per 600 balls in play this season.  He hasn’t been quite as consistent with line drives – even though if you take out last season, he does have a consistent declining trend.

Fangraphs doesn’t separate outfield flyballs from infield flyballs, but I like to do so.  By not separating them, you get the bottom graph – which shows that he is reversing the declining flyball trend.  The problem is that he’s on pace to hit more infield flyballs per 600 balls in play – by a very wide margin.  That obviously isn’t a good thing. 

Look only at his outfield flyballs per 600 balls in play, and you see a trend you don’t want to see from your cleanup hitter.  The number of outfield flyballs he’s hit per 6oo balls in play – 189, 179, 177, 149, and 129.  So even if 20% of all flyballs he’s hits becomes home runs he’d end up with 26 home runs this year.  There are three problems.  One is that his best HR/OFFB rate over this time has been 19.2% (which would equate to 25 HR), another is that his combined rate the previous four seasons was only 16.5% (22 HR), the final problem is that only his 2007 rate is only 8% – which would equate to only 10 HR.  If I had to guess, I’d say he’ll end up with right around 20 home runs.

As a Tejada and Orioles fan, I’m really hoping that OH’er Frobby is right in that Tejada’s a slow starter in the power department.  My fear is that he will continue to hit so many ground balls, and that his career high .377 BABIP (which is likely helped by his high number of ground balls, but is hurt by his relatively low LD%) will come back to earth.  If those my fears come true, they may be wishing they had traded him while his value was still high.

Continue down on the PDF file, and you’ll see similar graphs for Gibbons – with his Balls In Play normalized to 550.

Thanks for reading.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The Orioles and LI

Posted by cookinwithgas on May 6, 2007

I have posted additional information on the stats page.  One addition is the 2007 wOBA leaders amongst qualified batters (through May 3).  The stats needed for the formula are from Baseball Prospectus. 

 I have also added stats that show how Orioles pitchers and batters have done in the various levels of Leverage situations - Low, Medium, High, and Very High.  I’ve never seen them separated in this fashion.  Of course, that probably just means that I’m the only one who sees value in doing so.  We always hear about how certain batters do in clutch situations vice non-clutch.  I’m thinking this shows us just this.  Of course, I also have to give the standard sample size warning.

So what do the numbers tell us?  They’ve only had 31 opportunities in Very High Leverage situations, so I’ll skip those numbers initially.  Orioles batters actually perform better in Medium Leverage situations than they do in Low Leverage situations.  Their OPS by level (Low / Medium / High):

637 / 781 / 689

So they actually perform much better in Medium Leverage situations than they do in Low Leverage situations, before coming back to earth somewhat in High Leverage situations. 

One concern that I have is that their BB% and K% each goes in the wrong direction as the situation gets tougher:

BB% – 8.7 / 7.1 / 5.2

K% – 15.0 / 15.8 / 24.3

It would be interesting to see how these numbers compare to league averages.

The team leader in OPS in Low Leverage situations is Freddie Bynum (who saw that coming?), who was helped immensely by his home run and only eight opportunities.  The true leader is Mora (with only a .770 OPS).  Brian Roberts walked 20% of the time in these situations.

Kevin Millar leads the team in Medium Leverage situations with a 1.289 OPS, not to mention that he walks 19% of the time.  Based on WPA, Millar counts for a win all by himself with .469 WPA points.

Miguel Tejada leads those with at least 10 opportunities with a .904 OPS in High Leverage situations – even though he has yet to walk in 16 plate appearances.  Patterson has really hurt the team in these situations (accounting for almost 1 loss all by himself).

Patterson, Roberts, Millar, Markakis, Gomez, and Gibbons have all come through in Very High Leverage situations.

I also track how the team performs in situations in which the LI was 2.0 or higher.  Through their first 30 games, the Orioles had 290 such situations – 145 offensively, 145 defensively.  This works out to 12% of all plays. 

Starting pitchers produced positive results in 40 of 62 opportunities.  They had an overall WPA of .645 (so they have been 1.29 wins over .500).  They’ve held opposing batters to a .598 OPS in these situations.  The downside is that opposing batters have walked 17% of the time in these situations.

Relievers produced positive results in only 47 of 83 opportunities.  They had an overall WPA of 1.136 (so they have been 2.72 wins below .500).  Opposing batters have to the tune of a .873 OPS (and .410 OBP) in these situations.  Ouch.

Position players produced positive results in 49 of 145 opportunities (34% success rate compared to 35% in other situations).  They had an overall WPA of .065 (so they have been 0.13 wins over .500).  They’ve posted a .771 OPS in these situations. 

Overall, they have a WPA of (-).543 in these situations.  The overall team WPA is about (-)1.000 (by virtue of having lost two more games than they’ve won), which means they have about a (-).457 WPA in sub 2.0 Leverage situations.

NOTE: The data needed for this article is from the great site, Fangraphs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Posted by cookinwithgas on May 3, 2007

Peter Angelos, if you’re reading this, BLOW IT UP!  And I don’t just mean the team on the field.  Start at the relative top – with Mike Flanagan and Jim Duquette.  About the only member of the front office worth keeping is Jordan.  Replace Perlozzo, and the entire coaching staff.  Probably the only player I wouldn’t make available would be Markakis.

Unfortunately, none of those things will happen.  I get the feeling that if this team loses 90 games, everyone except maybe Perlozzo will keep his job (and it won’t surprise me if he returns), and the front office will feed us the same load of crap – “we need two big bats.”

End of rant – and yes, that felt better.

——————————————————————————————

I wrote another article for Orioles Hangout on WPA.  I love that stuff.  In fact, keep looking, and in a few days I’ll be posting Orioles related information pertaining to WPA and Leverage Index.  I’ve been tracking the Orioles performance in each of the four levels of LI – Low, Medium, High, and Very High Leverage. 

I’m hoping to post this data in the stats section on Thursday.  I’ll provide some comment on it as well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »